7 Most Sadistic Serial Killer Cases in Indonesia: Rian Bogor

 

(Tribun Bogor)

By:

Team of Hukumindo

Previously, the www.hukumindo.com platform has talk about "7 Most Sadistic Serial Killer Cases in Indonesia: Wowon Cs.", "How To Report Online Scammer Or Fraud To The Police In Indonesia", you may read also "How to Open a Police Report in Indonesia?" and on this occasion we will discuss about '7 Most Sadistic Serial Killer Cases in Indonesia: Rian Bogor'. This article still discusses cases of serial killer that have ever existed in Indonesia. 

The Beginning of the Case

The serial murder case that was carried out by Rian shocked the public in March 2021. The disclosure of the serial murder case began when the bodies of two women were found in Bogor City at different times. One body was found bound in a plastic bag in the Tanah Sareal area, on the edge of Jalan Raya Cilebut, Bogor City on February 25, 2021. Based on the results of the Bogor Police autopsy, a blunt force wound was found on the woman's neck which was later found to have the initials DP (18) . Two weeks after the discovery of DP's body, the Police arrested Rian who was suspected of killing DP.[1]

"We found out about this case after we conducted a long investigation for about two weeks. Collecting witnesses of up to 15 people, both relatives and colleagues, including key witnesses who pointed to the perpetrators," said Bogor Police Chief Kombes Pol Susatyo Purnomo Condro in a press conference, 11 March 2021.[2]

The Police found other facts during Rian's investigation. About two weeks after killing DP, Rian is also known to have killed a woman with the initials EL (23). EL's body was found on the side of the road in Pasir Angin Village, Megamendung, Bogor Regency on March 10 2021. Based on the autopsy results, blood spots were found in the mouth of a resident of Caringin District, Bogor.[3]

Murder Mode And Pattern

Rian uses the same modes and patterns when carrying out his actions. He chose his victims at random by getting to know them on Facebook social media. Then, Rian took his victim on a date in Puncak, Bogor Regency, with the lure of IDR. 1 million. After having a date at the hotel, Rian would kill the victim by strangling her and taking her property.[4]

Not only were the modes and patterns of the killings similar, Rian also chose the same hotel when killing the two victims. After killing, Rian put the victim's body in a large backpack to be disposed of. Susatyo said Rian was conscious when he killed the two victims. Based on other findings, there is a possibility that Rian will date other women and kill in the same way.[5]

"Based on the results of interrogation, the suspect may not be deterred from committing the first murder and the suspect enjoys the second murder. Currently we are still developing, including tracing the digital footprint of the suspect," said Susatyo. Therefore, during a psychiatric examination, the Police concluded that Rian was behaving like a psychopath or serial killer in a serial killer film.[6]

Sentenced to 13 Years in Prison

Muhamad Rian bin Mamad (21), the perpetrator of the serial killings of 2 women from Bogor was found guilty and sentenced to 13 years in prison by the Cibinong District Court. This sentence is 1 year lighter than the prosecutor's demand, which is 14 years in prison. "Muhamad Rian has been sentenced to 13 years in prison, because he was proven guilty of committing the crime of murder as stated in Article 338 of the Criminal Code," said Public Relations of Cibinong District Court Amran S Herman, Tuesday (23/11/2021).[7]

Quoted from the website of the Cibinong District Court (PN), Bogor Regency, the verdict against Rian was decided on Tuesday (5/10/2021). The decision was knocked out by a judge chaired by Christina Manulang along with 2 member judges Yulinda Trimurti Asih Muryati and Siti Suryani Hasanah.[8]

In addition, the panel of judges also decided to seize evidence related to Rian's case to be destroyed. The evidence is in the form of 9 pieces of IDR. 100 thousand & 1 IDR 50 thousand cash, 5 black polybags, 1 blue skirt with blood stains, pink bra with cut straps, 1 white shirt, 1 jeans, 1 blue shirt with white stripes and 1 mountain bag.[9] Creepy. And if you have any legal issue in Indonesia territory, contact us then, feel free in 24 hour, we will be happy to assist you. 

*) For further information please contact:

Mahmud Kusuma Advocate

Law Office

Jakarta - Indonesia.

E-mail: mahmudkusuma22@gmail.com

________________

References:

1. "Kilas Balik Kasus Rian Bogor, Pembunuh Berantai yang Divonis 13 Tahun Penjara", megapolitan.kompas.com., 24/11/2021, 05:11 WIB, Link: https://megapolitan.kompas.com/read/2021/11/24/05114931/kilas-balik-kasus-rian-bogor-pembunuh-berantai-yang-divonis-13-tahun?page=all

2. Ibid.

3. Ibid.

4. Ibid.

5. Ibid.

6. Ibid.

7. "Bunuh 2 Wanita Bogor, Rian 'Serial Killer' Divonis 13 Tahun Penjara", news.detik.com., M Solihin, Selasa, 23 Nov 2021 10:20 WIB, Diakses pada tanggal 13 Juni 2023, Link: https://news.detik.com/berita-jawa-barat/d-5823156/bunuh-2-wanita-bogor-rian-serial-killer-divonis-13-tahun-penjara

8. Ibid.

9. Ibid.

7 Most Sadistic Serial Killer Cases in Indonesia: Wowon Cs.

 

(Tribun Jabar)

By:

Team of Hukumindo

Previously, the www.hukumindo.com platform has talk about "Allegedly a Victim of Investment Fraud PT. Rifan, Customers Lose Nearly IDR. 2 Billion", you may read also "The Police Succeeded in Uncovering The Mode of the Wowon Cs. Murder Case Which Ended up Being a Serial Killer", as with an article that discusses crime series, the following article and the next 6 articles will discuss the most sadistic serial killer cases that have ever happened in Indonesia, and on this first occasion we will discuss about '7 Most Sadistic Serial Killer Cases in Indonesia: Wowon Cs.'. This case is still relatively new, and has not yet reached the relevant court.

The Police arrested three serial killers, namely Wowon Erawan alias Aki (60), Solihin alias Duloh (63), and Dede Solehudin (35). The actions of Wowon cs. were uncovered after five people were found lying foaming at the mouth in a rented house, in West Ciketing Village, RT 02 RW 03, Ciketing Udik Village, Bantargebang District, Bekasi, Thursday, January 12 2023. The five victims were named Maemunah (40), Ridwan (20), Riswandi (16), Neng Ayu (5), and Solehudin alias Dede (35).[1]

Initially, the neighbors heard the victim's voice moaning. Residents then approached the victim's house and saw the victims lying on the floor foaming at the mouth. Of the five victims, there were two survivors namely Neng Ayu and Dede. Initial suspicions that the five victims were poisoned. Kapolda (Regional Police Chief) Metro Jaya, Inspector General of Police Fadil Imran stated that the five victims were deliberately poisoned. Fadil Imran also revealed that the case was a serial killer. "They committed a series of murders or serial killers," said Kapolda (Regional Police Chief) Metro Jaya, Inspector General of Police Fadil Imran at Polda Metro Jaya Headquarters, Thursday, January 19, 2023. Furthermore, Fadil revealed that so far, a total of nine victims were killed by Wowon. Duloh, and Dede. The police said Wowon and Duloh were close friends who were also partners in the murder or partners in crime. Meanwhile, Dede is still a relative of Wowon. According to the police, the modus operandi of the perpetrators in killing their victims was the same. They took the victim home and poisoned him. If still breathing, the victim would be strangled. The victim's body was then buried in the area around the house. Fadil said that this mode was similar to the murder case committed by Ryan Jombang.[2]

The following is a list of victims of the serial killer Wowon cs.:[3]

1. The first victim: Siti, According to Police information, Wowon cs. is known as a powerful person who has supernatural powers. Wowon is also said to be able to double money. The target of this money doubling scam is female immigrant workers. The first victim was a TKW (immigrant worker) named Siti. He collects his money back after not believing Wowon's supernatural powers. Wowon agreed, but he reasoned that the money could only be taken by Siti in Mataram, Nusa Tenggara Barat province. Then, Siti was accompanied by Noneng, the in-laws of Wowon's wife named Wiwin, to go to Mataram. However, this was Wowon's plan to kill Siti. Wowon asked Noneng to push Siti into the sea on her way to Mataram. Noneng complied with Wowon's order and pushed Siti into the sea. Siti was swept away and her body which had disappeared was finally found by residents and buried in her hometown in Garut, West Java.
2. Second victim: Farida, the next victim was another TKW (immigrant worker) named Farida. Like Siti, Farida also asked Wowon to return the money because there was no clarity. Farida was killed and her body was buried in a hole at the perpetrator's house in the Cianjur area, West Java.
3. Third victim: Noneng (Wowon's mother-in-law), Noneng, who initially killed Siti, was finally killed by Wowon through Duloh's hands. Allegedly, Wowon was afraid that Noneng would report his crime to the authorities, so he decided to kill her. According to the Police, Noneng was escorted by Wowon to Duloh's house and killed there. Noneng was even reported missing to the Cimahi Police.
4. Fourth victim: Wiwin (Wowon's wife), after Noneng was killed, the next victim was Wiwin, who is Wowon's wife and Noneng's daughter. The murder was carried out in the same way as when Duloh killed Noneng. Even the provisional suspicion stated that the murder was based on Wowon's panic when his crime was discovered. Wiwin's body was then buried in the same place as his mother's body in the Cianjur house area.
5. Fifth victim: Halimah, it is known that Wowon had six wives, three of whom were victims of his murder. The fifth victim was Halimah, another Wowon's wife who was killed by Duloh. However, when Wowon and Duloh were interrogated by the Police, Wowon said that he did not know Halimah was killed by his own friend. What Wowon knows, Halimah died due to illness based on Duloh's confession. Halimah's body was then returned to her family in her hometown in Cililin, Bandung, West Java. Meanwhile, the police are still investigating Duloh's motive for killing Halimah.
6. Sixth victim: Bayu (Wowon's Child from Maemunah), after Halimah's death, it is known that Wowon remarried to Maemunah, who is Halimah's daughter. Maemunah herself has two children with Didin, her ex-husband. Maemunah's two children are Ridwan (20) and Riswandi (16). Meanwhile, the children from Wowon's marriage to Maemunah are named Bayu (2) and Neng Ayu (5). The motive is not yet known, Bayu, who was still a toddler, was also killed by Duloh in Cianjur and his body was buried around the house.
7. Seventh to Ninth victims: Maemunah, Ridwan, and Riswandi, after Bayu's murder, Wowon and Duloh returned to action to kill Maemunah, Ridwan and Riswandi. They were declared dead after drinking coffee containing rat poison and pesticides. The poison content was revealed after the Police examined coffee samples and samples of the victim's stomach contents at the National Police Forensic Laboratory. The Police also found a hole that would be used to bury the victims in a rented house in Bekasi. Luckily, local residents found the victim's body before Wowon and Duloh could bury it. The Police have also processed the crime scene at the Cianjur location on Friday, January 20, 2023. This was done to match the identity of the victim with the skeleton found.

Meanwhile, the Police said that a total of IDR. 1 billion was tricked from the migrant workers. The money was kept in the account belonging to the suspect Dede. However, the ATM card was held by Wowon. It is suspected that the money for these TKW (immigrant worker) has been collected since 2019.[4] It's Creepy-sadistic criminal action. And if you have any legal issue in Indonesia territory, contact us then, feel free in 24 hour, we will be happy to assist you. 

*) For further information please contact:

Mahmud Kusuma Advocate

Law Office

Jakarta - Indonesia.

E-mail: mahmudkusuma22@gmail.com

________________

References:

1. "Ngeri! Ini Kronologi Lengkap Aksi Pembunuhan Berantai Wowon Cs Hingga Renggut 9 Nyawa", www.suaramerdeka.com., Noor Atiyan Puji Lestari, Sabtu, 21 Januari 2023, 14:57 WIB, Diakses pada tanggal 10 Juni 2023, Link: https://www.suaramerdeka.com/nasional/pr-046961486/ngeri-ini-kronologi-lengkap-aksi-pembunuhan-berantai-wowon-cs-hingga-renggut-9-nyawa

2. Ibid.

3. Ibid.

4. Ibid.

Allegedly a Victim of Investment Fraud PT. Rifan, Customers Lose Nearly IDR. 2 Billion

 

(iStock)

By:

Team of Hukumindo

Previously, the www.hukumindo.com platform has talk about "Banking Crime Mode Appears Again in Indonesia", "How To Report Online Scammer Or Fraud To The Police In Indonesia", you may read also "How to Open a Police Report in Indonesia?" and on this occasion we will discuss about 'Allegedly a Victim of Investment Fraud PT. Rifan, Customers Lose Nearly IDR. 2 Billion'.

A person named Daniel claimed to be a victim of suspected commodity futures trading investment fraud. Daniel admitted that he suffered a loss of nearly IDR. 2 billion because of the investment. Daniel said he had opened several accounts at PT. Rifan Financindo Berjangka. On October 14 2021, he opened a RAPW 5913 account at Axa Tower and on October 18 2021 he opened a new RAPW 5921 account at the same place. Daniel is directed by the analyst every transaction. Previously, he received information that the price would definitely rise at the opening of the market.[1]

On October 29, 2021, he also contacted analysts, but received no response. "Finally I took the initiative to buy 3 lots," he told detikcom, Friday (2/6/2023). At noon, he was contacted by his superior analyst, to take another 2 lots again. In fact, he already took 3 lots. "I'm layman in futures trading, I took 2 lots," he said. However, he received information, prices fell because the United States (US) dollar strengthened. Finally, he was exposed to auto liquidation and he was asked to top up. However, because he didn't have the funds to top up, it was finally clear by the system. He said auto liquidation occurred because prices did not meet expectations. He said, if the price does not meet expectations then there are two choices, namely cut loss or holding it at the risk of hospitalization costs.[2]

"If we bear an overnight fee of US$ 5 per day per 1 lot. So if for example there are 10 lots held, there will be an overnight fee of US$ 5 per 1 lot per day. This will automatically eat into the resilience of existing funds. So, when Later there will be a minimum capital or fund resilience, so we have to add new funds to be able to make transactions again," he explained. "Yesterday my account was locked, I can't make transactions, I have to top up, I'm not always ready to top up, at least Rp. 100 million top up. If later the resistance of the funds runs out, it's automatically cleared by the system, it's gone," he continued. He suspected that there was an intention to trick customers into being subject to auto liquidation. "There is an allegation that marketing is rogue on purpose to trap customers so they get auto liquidation and do top-ups," he said.[3]

Next, on December 22, 2021, he met again with marketing PT Rifan Financindo Berjangka at the DBS Tower. The marketing said, it can recover customer accounts that have lost elsewhere. He also opened an RDNI 2814 account. On February 14, 2022 he opened me again RDNI 2863 plus the lure of a Toyota Fortuner car if the transaction reached 5,500 lots in 12 months. "You say there is a program to get a Fortuner car with a total lot of 5,500. Within 12 months I can get a Fortuner car plus transaction profits," he said. Long story short, the money he disbursed was fruitless. In fact, he also made several top ups and the money went nowhere.[4]

Previously reported, in 2022 the Commodity Futures Trading Supervisory Agency (Bappebti) froze the business activities of PT. Rifan Financindo Futures Brokerage. This was stated in the Decree of the Head of CoFTRA Number 01 of 2022. In the official statement from CoFTRA, it was stated that the suspension of this activity was because PT. Rifan Financindo Berjangka was deemed not to have made improvements to the administrative sanctions given. CoFTRA has issued three written warnings. "Based on the results of Bappebti's examination, PT. Rifan Financindo Berjangka is in the process of accepting customers and the process of carrying out transactions that are not in accordance with procedures," wrote the statement quoted on Tuesday (8/3/2022).[5] And if you have any legal issue in Indonesia territory, contact us then, feel free in 24 hour, we will be happy to assist you. 

*) For further information please contact:

Mahmud Kusuma Advocate

Law Office

Jakarta - Indonesia.

E-mail: mahmudkusuma22@gmail.com

________________

References:

1. "Diduga Jadi Korban Penipuan Investasi PT Rifan, Nasabah Rugi Hampir Rp 2 M", finance.detik.com., Diakses pada tanggal 4 Juni 2023, Link: https://finance.detik.com/berita-ekonomi-bisnis/d-6751917/diduga-jadi-korban-penipuan-investasi-pt-rifan-nasabah-rugi-hampir-rp-2-m

2. Ibid.

3. Ibid.

4. Ibid.

5. Ibid.

Banking Crime Mode Appears Again in Indonesia

(iStock)

By:

Team of Hukumindo

Previously, the www.hukumindo.com platform has talk about "This Rich Socialite Must Give IDR. 119 Billion in Benefits to Her Ex-Husband as a Consequences of Divorce", "5 Latest Online Fraud Modes and Their Characteristics", you may read also "How To Report Online Scammer Or Fraud To The Police In Indonesia" and on this occasion we will discuss about 'Banking Crime Mode Appears Again in Indonesia'.

The mode of banking crime continues to grow every day. As happened at PT. Bank Tabungan Negara Tbk. (BTN), the perpetrators have now been arrested and dismantled by the bank and Polda (Regional Police) Metro Jaya. Bank BTN Corporate Secretary Ramon Armando said the company had reported the case to Polda Metro Jaya since February 6, 2023. Apart from that, Bank BTN had also asked to block funds at 3 (three) banks suspected of being related to suspicious transactions. "We have zero tolerance for activities that are suspected of being suspicious transactions, even the insiders involved have been terminated," said Ramon in a statement written Friday (2/6/2023).[1]

According to Ramon, based on Bank BTN's report, Polda Metro Jaya moved quickly to investigate the case. On April 14, 2023, the Sub Directorate of Harda Ditreskrimum Polda Metro Jaya has determined the status of the two individuals as suspects and after going through a search process, on Wednesday, May 31, 2023 the ASW suspect was arrested by investigators for further investigation and development. "Bank BTN would like to thank Polda Metro Jaya, Polda North Sulawesi and Polresta Manado for working hard in searching for and arresting the perpetrators. Hopefully this will be the start of successful disclosure of the banking crime mafia in Indonesia," said Ramon.[2]

It is known that the modus operandi of banking crimes involved a number of fund owners who cooperated with ASW to place funds in banks with the promise of getting an interest rate of 10% each month. This interest rate has never existed in banking, especially Bank BTN. The account opening process is also not in accordance with bank regulations. "The owners of the funds also never came to the bank to open an account and never had a passbook or ATM card. They have received interest payments from ASW several times, but then the payments were not smooth and stopped," explained Ramon. Ramon explained, Bank BTN guarantees the security of all customer transactions by implementing Prudential Banking and Good Corporate Governance in accordance with statutory regulations. "We are committed to taking firm action against any violation of the law and will not protect any party, including in this case bank employees who have been proven to have violated the law," he explained.[3]

Ramon further appealed to the public not to be tempted by high interest offers and not in accordance with the provisions of the Financial Services Authority (OJK) and the Deposit Insurance Corporation (LPS). "The public must be aware that if there is an offer with high and out-of-the-ordinary interest, there must be something wrong with the offer. Don't because of the high interest, people become dark-eyed and irrational," he added.[4] And if you have any legal issue in Indonesia territory, contact us then, feel free in 24 hour, we will be happy to assist you. 

*) For further information please contact:

Mahmud Kusuma Advocate

Law Office

Jakarta - Indonesia.

E-mail: mahmudkusuma22@gmail.com

________________

References:

1. "Hati-hati! Modus Kejahatan Perbankan Muncul Lagi Nih", finance.detik.com., Diakses pada tanggal 4 Juni 2023, Link: https://finance.detik.com/moneter/d-6752123/hati-hati-modus-kejahatan-perbankan-muncul-lagi-nih

2. Ibid.

3. Ibid.

4. Ibid.

This Rich Socialite Must Give IDR. 119 Billion in Benefits to Her Ex-Husband as a Consequences of Divorce

(iStock)

By:

Team of Hukumindo

Previously, the www.hukumindo.com platform has talk about "Direksi Sebagai Agen Perusahaan", "10 Mega-Corruption Cases with the Largest Losses in Indonesia", you may read also "How to submit a divorce lawsuit in Indonesia" and on this occasion we will discuss about 'This rich socialite must give IDR. 119 billion in benefits to her ex-husband as a Consequences of divorce'.

Divorce benefits are usually given by the husband to his ex-wife. However, the situation could be different if the ex-wife has a larger income. A businesswoman Louise Backstrom with assets of IDR. 4.6 trillion was involved in a dispute with her ex-husband Martin Wennberg when they divorced. Martin wants £40 million worth of money from his ex-wife who is also known as a socialite from Sweden but lives in London. But High Court Deputy Judge in London Leslie Samuels fought back and downplayed the value of his demands. The court then ruled that Louise should provide £6.5 million in alimony or around IDR.119 billion to her ex-husband in accordance with the pre-nuptial agreement.[1]

Not only did Martin get the billions, but he was also entitled to an allowance of £60,000, IDR. 1.1 billion annually for the next six years. Judge Samuels, who oversaw the trial in the Family Division of the High Court of the Royal Court, outlined his conclusions in a written decision declaring that the grades were right to go to Louise's ex-husband.[2]

"In any view, the standard of living enjoyed by this family prior to the breakdown of the marriage was extremely high," Judge Samuels said, as quoted by the Mirror. "The parties enjoy the provision of great value London property, staff, high end holidays, unlimited travel options and overall the very best that can be provided," the judge added.[3] And if you have any legal issue in Indonesia territory, contact us then, feel free in 24 hour, we will be happy to assist you. 

*) For further information please contact:

Mahmud Kusuma Advocate

Law Office

Jakarta - Indonesia.

E-mail: mahmudkusuma22@gmail.com

________________

References:

1. "Cerai, Sosialita Tajir Ini Harus Berikan Tunjangan ke Eks Suami Rp 119 Miliar",  wolipop.detik.com., Diakses pada tanggal 4 Juni 2023, Link: https://wolipop.detik.com/wedding-news/d-6750994/cerai-sosialita-tajir-ini-harus-berikan-tunjangan-ke-eks-suami-rp-119-miliar

2. Ibid.

3. Ibid.

The Police Succeeded in Uncovering The Mode of the Wowon Cs. Murder Case Which Ended up Being a Serial Killer

 

(iStock)

By:

Team of Hukumindo

Previously, the www.hukumindo.com platform has talk about "Be Careful Using AI, You Will be in Trouble for Citing Non-existent Jurisprudence", "The Mystery of the 7-Year Death of Akseyna, University of Indonesia Student", you may read also "The Murder Case of Anjani Bee, which is Still a Mystery" and on this occasion we will discuss about 'The police succeeded in uncovering the mode of the Wowon Cs murder case which ended up being a serial killer'.

The Police succeeded in uncovering the mode of the serial killer case by Wowon Erawan (60) and friends. Wowon cs.apparently immediately executed the victims when they were asked for the results of 'doubling the money'. Polda Metro Jaya Dirkrimum Kombes Hengki Haryadi explained that the perpetrators collected funds from the victims with the lure of doubling the money. Some of the victims were migrant workers who had sent money. They were hysterical when they found out that Wowon cs. were in fact the suspects in the serial killings in Bekasi and Cianjur.[1]

The police are still investigating migrant workers who have made money transfer transactions with Wowon. There are TKW (migrant workers) who have sent money to Wowon since several years ago. For information, the suspect Wowon assisted Solihin alias Duloh (63) and Dede Sholehudin alias Dede (34) in carrying out his actions. Dede's job is to collect funds from the migrant workers. Meanwhile, Duloh is a shaman who claims to be able to multiply money. The TKW dared to transfer the money because they were promised that when they returned to Indonesia, they would get a nice house and double the money. The police found funds of up to IDR 1 billion from Dede's account. Dede allegedly collected funds from the victim because the ATM was owned by Wowon. The funds were transferred to an account in the name of Dede Sholehudin. Dede was originally a victim, then he became a suspect in this case.[2]

Not only from the TKW (migrant workers), the total number of victims who were killed, namely 9 people, were still related to Wowon's family. The victims were killed by being given poisoned coffee, strangled, and so on. The victims killed in Bekasi were Ai Maemunah (40), Wowon's wife. Then there are Ridwan and Riswandi who are the children of Ai Maemunah and her ex-husband Didin. Furthermore, the victim who was killed in Cianjur was Noneng, Wowon's father-in-law. Then Wiwin, who is Wowon's first wife and stepdaughter. Plus Bayu as the son of Ai Maemunah and Wowon.[3]

Not only that, Farida, a migrant worker, and Halimah, the wife of 'Siri' Wowon, the mother of Ai Maemunah, were also killed in Bekasi. Furthermore, the victim who was killed and buried in Surabaya was Siti as a migrant worker by being thrown into the sea. It is also known that Siti, a migrant worker, ordered her mother-in-law, Noneng, to push Siti into the sea. Siti and Farida are suspected to be the first victims of the series of killings. Residents of Siti's body were found and buried in Garut.[4] And if you have any legal issue in Indonesia territory, contact us then, feel free in 24 hour, we will be happy to assist you. 

*) For further information please contact:

Mahmud Kusuma Advocate

Law Office

Jakarta - Indonesia.

E-mail: mahmudkusuma22@gmail.com

________________

References:

1. "Polisi berhasil mengungkap modus kasus pembunuhan Wowon Cs yang Berakhir Jadi Serial Killer", reskrimum.metro.polri.go.id., Diakses pada tanggal 28 Mei 2023, Link: https://reskrimum.metro.polri.go.id/2023/01/22/polisi-berhasil-mengungkap-modus-kasus-pembunuhan-wowon-cs-yang-berakhir-jadi-serial-killer/

2. Ibid.

3. Ibid.

4. Ibid.

Be Careful Using AI, You Will be in Trouble for Citing Non-existent Jurisprudence

 

(iStock)

By:

Team of Hukumindo

Previously, the www.hukumindo.com platform has talk about "45 Indonesian Citizens Become Victims of Scammer Companies in Laos", "5 Most Bizarre Court Cases in US History", you may read also "5 Interesting Cases that Become the Jurisprudence of the Supreme Court in Indonesia" and on this occasion we will discuss about 'Be Careful Using AI, You Will be in Trouble for Citing Non-existent Jurisprudence'.

Lawyer Steven Schwartz of Levidow, Levidow & Oberman has been practicing law for three decades. Now, one case can completely derail his entire career. Why? He relied on ChatGPT in his legal filings and the AI chatbot completely manufactured previous cases, which Schwartz cited, out of thin air.[1]

It all starts with the case in question, Mata v. Avianca. According to the New York Times, an Avianca customer named Roberto Mata was suing the airline after a serving cart injured his knee during a flight. Avianca attempted to get a judge to dismiss the case. In response, Mata's lawyers objected and submitted a brief filled with a slew of similar court decisions in the past. And that's where ChatGPT came in. Schwartz, Mata's lawyer who filed the case in state court and then provided legal research once it was transferred to Manhattan federal court, said he used OpenAI's popular chatbot in order to "supplement" his own findings.[2]

ChatGPT provided Schwartz with multiple names of similar cases: Varghese v. China Southern Airlines, Shaboon v. Egyptair, Petersen v. Iran Air, Martinez v. Delta Airlines, Estate of Durden v. KLM Royal Dutch Airlines, and Miller v. United Airlines. The problem? ChatGPT completely made up all those cases. They do not exist.[3]

Avianca's legal team and the judge assigned to this case soon realized they could not locate any of these court decisions. This led to Schwartz explaining what happened in an affidavit on Thursday. The lawyer had referred to ChatGPT for help with his filing. According to Schwartz, he was "unaware of the possibility that its content could be false.” The lawyer even provided screenshots to the judge of his interactions with ChatGPT, asking the AI chatbot if one of the cases were real. ChatGPT responded that it was. It even confirmed that the cases could be found in "reputable legal databases." Again, none of them could be found because the cases were all created by the chatbot.[4]

It's important to note that ChatGPT, like all AI chatbots, is a language model trained to follow instructions and provide a user with a response to their prompt. That means, if a user asks ChatGPT for information, it could give that user exactly what they're looking for, even if it's not factual. The judge has ordered a hearing next month to "discuss potential sanctions" for Schwartz in response to this “unprecedented circumstance." That circumstance again being a lawyer filing a legal brief using fake court decisions and citations provided to him by ChatGPT.[5] And if you have any legal issue in Indonesia territory, contact us then, feel free in 24 hour, we will be happy to assist you. 

*) For further information please contact:

Mahmud Kusuma Advocate

Law Office

Jakarta - Indonesia.

E-mail: mahmudkusuma22@gmail.com

________________

References:

1. "A lawyer used ChatGPT for legal filing. The chatbot cited nonexistent cases it just made up", www.aol.com., Diakses pada tanggal 28 Mei 2023, Link: https://www.aol.com/lawyer-used-chatgpt-legal-filing-195434452.html

2. Ibid.

3. Ibid.

4. Ibid.

5. Ibid.

45 Indonesian Citizens Become Victims of Scammer Companies in Laos

(iStock)

By:

Team of Hukumindo

Previously, the www.hukumindo.com platform has talk about "This woman lost IDR 2.38 billion Because of Fraudulent SMS", "How To Report Online Scammer Or Fraud To The Police In Indonesia", you may read also "What's The Difference Between Police Report and Public Complaint?" and on this occasion we will discuss about '45 Indonesian Citizens Become Victims of Scammer Companies in Laos'.

As many as 45 Indonesian citizens (WNI) are reported to have become victims of online scamming companies in Laos. The Indonesian Embassy in Vientiane also urged local authorities to follow up on the case. The Director for the Protection of Indonesian Citizens and Legal Entities at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia, Judha Nugraha, said the Indonesian Embassy in Vientiane received a complaint from an Indonesian citizen with the initials MNH who claimed to have left a scamming company in Laos with dozens of other Indonesian citizens. They became victims of the company, where they were asked to work as online scammers with their passports being held by the company.[1]

"On Wednesday, 24 May 2023 afternoon, the Indonesian Embassy in Vientiane received a complaint from Brother MNH who stated that 45 Indonesian citizens including himself had left the company where they worked as online scammers in the Golden Triangle Special Economic Zone. Their passports were being held by the company," said the company. Judha in his statement, Friday (26/5). Judha also said that the Indonesian Embassy in Vientiane immediately followed up on the complaint by sending a request for assistance with picking up passports to the Lao police who were in Bokeo the next day. "The Bokeo Police have met Mr MNH and 7 other Indonesian citizens to ask for their statements and take their photos. The Indonesian Embassy in Vientiene continues to monitor the progress of the investigation process and law enforcement steps taken by the Bokeo Police," he said.[2]

Judha said that until now there were at least 29 cases of Indonesian citizens being handled by the local Police. The Indonesian Embassy in Vientiane always "monitors and encourages local authorities to follow up on cases" that befell Indonesian citizens in accordance with applicable legal procedures. Previously, a viral video on social media showed a group of Indonesian citizens claiming to be stranded in Laos because their passports were being held by a company. The narrator of the video said he and the Indonesian citizens had been stranded for four days in the foreign country because their passports had not been returned.[3] And if you have any legal issue in Indonesia territory, contact us then, feel free in 24 hour, we will be happy to assist you. 

*) For further information please contact:

Mahmud Kusuma Advocate

Law Office

Jakarta - Indonesia.

E-mail: mahmudkusuma22@gmail.com

________________

References:

1. "45 WNI Jadi Korban Perusahaan Scammer, KBRI Laos Desak Tindak Lanjut", www.cnnindonesia.com., Diakses pada tanggal 28 Mei 2023, Link:  https://www.cnnindonesia.com/internasional/20230526204255-106-954603/45-wni-jadi-korban-perusahaan-scammer-kbri-laos-desak-tindak-lanjut

2. Ibid.

3. Ibid.

 

This woman lost IDR 2.38 billion Because of Fraudulent SMS

 

(iStock)

By:

Team of Hukumindo

Previously, the www.hukumindo.com platform has talk about "Personal Data Must Be Safeguarded To Keep Bank Accounts Safe", "Chronology of Indosurya Fraud Cases, The Largest Losses in Indonesia!", "How to Open a Police Report in Indonesia?" you may read also "How To Report Online Scammer Or Fraud To The Police In Indonesia" and on this occasion we will discuss about 'This woman lost IDR 2.38 billion Because of Fraudulent SMS'.

A woman becomes the victim of a bank account 'burglary'. This was experienced by Deborah Moss, a catering entrepreneur in California, who lost up to US$ 160 thousand or the equivalent to IDR. 2.38 billion (assuming an exchange rate of IDR. 14,900/1 US $). Deborah became a victim of account breaches when she received an SMS from a number claiming to be the bank informing her about a monthly debit card fee of US$ 35 per month.[1]

At first he ignored the short message. Until finally he got a call from someone who claimed to be an employee of Chase Bank, the place where he kept the money. Deborah said the employee claimed to be Barbara. Then Barbara said there was an allegation of fraud committed by Deborah. Therefore Barbara asked for Deborah's personal data for verification. Then Deborah was asked to read out the number that came in through a short message. "I obeyed and mentioned the numbers. He said thank you," he said.[2]

Every day of the week, Barbara kept calling Deborah and saying there was a problem with the delivery of the card. Deborah is always asked to mention the numbers that come through her SMS. Until then Deborah went to the nearest branch office. Then the bank employee at the office said that his account had been drained of up to US$ 160,000. "All my money is gone, the 12 years of savings that I collected are gone," he said.[3]

The incident experienced by Deborah is also experienced by many Americans. The government even noted that the loss from this account breach reached US$ 8.8 billion in 2022, up 30% compared to the previous year. Deborah has reported the matter to the Police and is hoping to get her money back. But his hopes were dashed when the bank rejected his claim. Chase Bank said that during its investigation, the bank did not find Deborah's protection efforts for her own account. The bank said that there would be no refund, because the bank considered that it was pure Deborah's negligence. Deborah was devastated to hear the news. "My world feels shattered," he said.[4]

JPMorgan Chase provided a response to this case, they said that Deborah's bank account was compromised by scammers and the fraudster managed to get other confidential information. Chase Bank said they had contacted Deborah via phone and email regarding the transfer. However, Deborah admitted that she never received any message from the bank.[5] And if you have any legal issue in Indonesia territory, contact us then, feel free in 24 hour, we will be happy to assist you. 

*) For further information please contact:

Mahmud Kusuma Advocate

Law Office

Jakarta - Indonesia.

E-mail: mahmudkusuma22@gmail.com

________________

References:

1. "Ngeri! Gara-gara SMS, Wanita Ini Kehilangan Duitnya Rp 2,38 M", finance.detik.com., Sylke Febrina Laucereno - detikFinance, Sabtu, 27 Mei 2023, Diakses pada tanggal 28 Mei 2023, Link: https://finance.detik.com/moneter/d-6742264/ngeri-gara-gara-sms-wanita-ini-kehilangan-duitnya-rp-238-m.

2. Ibid.

3. Ibid.

4. Ibid.

5. Ibid.

Personal Data Must Be Safeguarded To Keep Bank Accounts Safe

 

(iStock)

By:

Team of Hukumindo

Previously, the www.hukumindo.com platform has talk about "Contoh Surat Permohonan Pembatalan Nikah Muslim", "How to Open a Police Report in Indonesia?", you may read also "How To Report Online Scammer Or Fraud To The Police In Indonesia" and on this occasion we will discuss about 'Personal Data Must Be Safeguarded To Keep Bank Accounts Safe'.

A number of cases of personal data hacking are still occurring and affecting the banking sector in Indonesia. Therefore, customers must also be able to protect their data so that there are no gaps for irresponsible parties to break into it. This is because personal data is the responsibility of the customer. Although in principle all bank activities are overseen by the Financial Services Authority (OJK) and Bank Indonesia (BI). The bank must run the service carefully.[1]

However, customer data breaches still occur. Many factors become triggers, both from the banking system and from customers. However, so far the breach of customer data is generally caused more by the negligence of the customer himself. Executive Director of the Segara Research Institute Piter Abdullah admitted that customer data breaches have so far been generally caused by customer negligence, especially in maintaining the confidentiality of personal data in the form of identities, passbooks, PINs and other personal data. According to him, the low literacy of the Indonesian people is one of the main factors causing the high level of customer data leakage. Of course this should be of particular concern to regulators.[2]

He revealed that the public as customers must also be wiser and more careful in using social media, especially when it comes to banking because it can trigger public distrust of banks. Meanwhile, Banking Observer Paul Sutaryono added, the role of the OJK is very much needed in encouraging literacy, education and outreach to the Indonesian public regarding data confidentiality. Thus, the level of financial literacy of the community will be higher. These efforts will be able to reduce the potential risk of financial cases such as banks and other financial institutions that are vulnerable to data breaches.[3]

"OJK, as the highest regulator of the financial services sector, should continue to provide education and outreach about finance. This can contain both honey (benefits) and poison (risk potential) of banking products and services," added Paul. However, this returns to the customers themselves. Customers must fully understand the risks that occur if they are negligent in using banking services. "Don't forget that customers or consumers must also continue to study and maintain the security of personal data related to banking products and services that they have. This data can be in the form of ATMs, savings books, account numbers, KTP numbers, names of biological mothers. All of this is very useful for preventing fraud. potential risk of fraud that can be detrimental to banks and customers," he said.[4] And if you have any legal issue in Indonesia territory, contact us then, feel free in 24 hour, we will be happy to assist you. 

*) For further information please contact:

Mahmud Kusuma Advocate

Law Office

Jakarta - Indonesia.

E-mail: mahmudkusuma22@gmail.com

________________

References:

1. "Data Pribadi Wajib Dijaga Supaya Rekening Tetap Aman", finance.detik.com., Minggu, 19 Mar 2023 22:45 WIB, Diakses pada tanggal 28 Mei 2023, Link: https://finance.detik.com/moneter/d-6627710/data-pribadi-wajib-dijaga-supaya-rekening-tetap-aman.

2. Ibid.

3. Ibid.

4. Ibid.

Contoh Surat Permohonan Pembatalan Nikah Muslim

(iStock)

Oleh:

Tim Hukumindo

Pada kesempatan yang lalu platform www.hukumindo.com telah membahas mengenai "Jeanne Mandagi, Jenderal Polisi Wanita Pertama", "Contoh Surat Permohonan Pengesahan Perkawinan Secara Mandiri" dan "Contoh Permohonan Penetapan Perkawinan Beda Agama", pada kesempatan ini akan dibahas mengenai 'Contoh Surat Permohonan Pembatalan Nikah Muslim'.

 

Ampana, ..........................

Perihal : Permohonan Pembatalan Nikah

Kepada Yth.

Ketua Pengadilan Agama Ampana

Di,

     Ampana.

Assalamu’alaikum Wr. Wb.

Yang bertanda tangan di bawah ini saya :

N a m a : ..................................

Umur : ..... tahun

Agama : Islam

Pekerjaan : ....................................

Pendidikan : ........................

Tempat kediaman di : Dukuh....... RT....RW...... Desa/kelurahan........Kecamatan.........Kabupaten.....,

sebagai "Pemohon";

Dengan hormat, dengan ini Pemohon mengajukan permohonan pembatalan perkawinan terhadap:

Nama Suami : ...........................................

Umur : .... tahun

Agama : Islam 

Pekerjaan : ......................

Pendidikan : ................................

Tempat kediaman di : Dukuh....... RT....RW...... Desa/kelurahan........Kecamatan.........Kabupaten.....,

sebagai "Termohon I";

Nama: .................................

Umur : .....tahun

Agama : Islam

Pekerjaan : ...........................

Pendidikan : ....................................

Tempat kediaman di : Dukuh....... RT....RW...... Desa/kelurahan........Kecamatan.........Kabupaten.....,

sebagai "Termohon II";

Adapun alasan/dalil-dalil permohonan Pemohon sebagai berikut :

1. Bahwa pada tanggal ...... Termohon I dan Termohon II telah melangsungkan pernikahan yang dicatat oleh Pegawai Pencatat Nikah Kantor Urusan Agama Kecamatan ....... Kabupatenagaimana ternyata dalam Kutipan Akta Nikah Nomor : ....... tanggal ...........;

2. Bahwa sebelum menikah Termohon I berstatus jejaka/duda/beristri dan Termohon II berstatus perawan/duda;

3. Bahwa setelah pernikahan tersebut, Termohon I dengan Termohon II bertempat tinggal di ......................................................................;

4. Bahwa pada tanggal ........ datang menghadap ke Kantor Urusan Agama Kecamatan .........., seorang perempuan/laki-laki yang mengaku bernama ........, umur ...... tahun, pekerjaan ........, bertempat tinggal di ....... adalah isteri/suami dari Termohon I yang sah dan telah menikah pada tanggal ...... hingga sekarang belum pernah bercerai;

5. Bahwa ketika menikah tersebut Termohon I/Termohon II mengaku berstatus jejaka dan perawan/ duda dan janda;

6. Bahwa kedatangan perempuan/laki-laki tersebut dengan menunjukkan surat nikah yang dikeluarkan oleh Kantor Urusan Agama Kecamatan ..... Kabupaten ........, dengan nomor surat nikah ....... tanggal .........;

7. Bahwa setelah Pemohon berusaha mencari keterangan terhadap pernikahan kembali Termohon I dengan Termohon II, Pemohon akhirnya memastikan memang benar antara Termohon I dengan Termohon II telah menikah;

8. Bahwa pernikahan antara Termohon I dengan Termohon II telah melanggar ketentuan Undang-Undang Perkawinan Nomor 1 Tahun 1974, karena Termohon I masih terikat perkawinan yang sah dengan ........ dan memalsukan identitas diri dengan mengaku berstatus jejaka dan perawan/duda dan janda;

9. Bahwa atas sikap dan perbuatan Termohon I tersebut Pemohon sebagai isteri/suami yang sah merasa tidak rela;

10. Bahwa para Pemohon sanggup membayar seluruh biaya yang timbul dalam perkara ini.

Berdasarkan alasan/dalil-dalil di atas, Pemohon mohon agar Ketua Pengadilan Agama Ampana c.q. Majelis Hakim segera memeriksa dan mengadili perkara ini, selanjutnya menjatuhkan putusan yang amarnya berbunyi :

PRIMER :

1. Mengabulkan permohonan Pemohon;

2. Membatalkan perkawinan antara Termohon I (....bin ......) dengan Termohon II (.....binti........) yang dilangsungkan di Kantor Urusan Agama Kecamatan ..... pada tanggal ..............;

3. Menyatakan Akta Nikah dan Kutipan Akta Nikah Nomor ...... tanggal ......., yang dikeluarkan oleh Kantor Urusan Agama Kecamatan ....... tidak berkekuatan hukum/batal demi hukum;

4. Membebankan biaya perkara kepada Pemohon;

SUBSIDER:

Apabila pengadilan berpendapat lain, mohon penetapan yang seadil-adilnya (Ex aequo et bono);

Demikian atas terkabulnya permohonan ini, Pemohon menyampaikan terima kasih.

Wassalamu’alaikum Wr. Wb.

Hormat Pemohon,

Ttd.

Nama lengkap

____________________

Reference:

1. "Permohonan Pembatalan Nikah", www.pa-ampana.go.id., Diakses pada tanggal 20 Mei 2023, Link: https://www.pa-ampana.go.id/syarat-dan-form-perkara/263-format-surat-gugatan-permohonan/650-30-format-permohonan-pembatalan-nikah

Chronology of Indosurya Fraud Cases, The Largest Losses in Indonesia!

(iStock)

By:

Team of Hukumindo

Previously, the www.hukumindo.com platform has talk about "Sisi Lain Komjen Pol. Mohammad Jasin", "How To Report Online Scammer Or Fraud To The Police In Indonesia", you may read also "How to Open a Police Report in Indonesia?" and on this occasion we will discuss about 'Chronology of Indosurya Fraud Cases, The Largest Losses in Indonesia!'.

How did this case start? This case has been in the public's attention for the past few years. It all started in mid-2020. On February 24, to be precise, several customers started receiving letters from the Indosurya cooperative that money in deposits or savings could not be disbursed. The money can only be taken 6 months to 4 years depending on the nominal asset under management (AUM).[1]

Then on March 7, customers claimed to receive notifications via WA that customers could withdraw their savings starting March 9, 2020 with a withdrawal limit of IDR 1 million per customer. After that, on March 12, 2020, the customer received an invitation to meet with the ISP. At the meeting each customer was asked to choose the desired payment option, the option depends on the AUM of each customer with payment terms ranging from 3 years to 10 years.[2]

Then the issue of KSP Indosurya decreased, but only for a moment. Around June 2021, the issue of KSP Indosurya has surfaced again. The DPR-RI even summoned the Ministry of Cooperatives regarding this issue. From this it was revealed, apparently KSP Indosurya had failed to make it into the Debt Payment Obligation Suspension (PKPU) process. The first decision fell on July 17 2020. Then there was an appeals process and PKPU was decided at the end of December 2020. The Indosurya KSP default case led to detention three suspects. The three of them are the Head of KSP Indosurya Cipta, Henry Surya and the Head of Indosurya Admin, June Indri are free. However, all three were released from detention in the middle of this year. The reason is because the detention period of 120 days has expired. Even so, Henry and June are still suspects. The case that ensnare him also continues.[3]

The Coordinating Minister for Political, Legal and Security Affairs Mahfud MD opened his voice regarding the release of two suspects KSP Indosurya from the Criminal Investigation Police Detention Center. He has communicated with the Police Headquarters, the Attorney General's Office, PPATK, and the Menkop UKM that this case is a new mode of crime that has never been and will not be stopped. "Responding to the public's reaction to the sense of justice in the KSP Indosurya case where two suspects were released, I have communicated with the National Police Headquarters, the Attorney General's Office, PPATK, and the Coordinating Minister for UKM. In conclusion, this case is a new mode of crime that has never been and will not be stopped," Mahfud said.[4]

Mahfud explained that the two suspects were released from the detention center because their detention period had expired. He said the Attorney General's Office was making sure that the evidence in court would run smoothly. Mahfud continued, he supported Bareskrim Polri in re-arresting two suspects who had been released from detention centers with different locus and offenses. He said the case must go on.[5]

"We support Bareskrim in arresting 2 more suspects in related cases whose locus and tempus delicti are different. PPATK has been following this for a long time, this case must go on," he said. In this case, the suspects were charged with Article 46 of the Banking Law, which carries a cumulative 15-year prison sentence under the Money Laundering Prevention Act (TPPU), which carries a 20-year sentence. One other suspect, namely Suwito Ayub, is still a fugitive.[6] And if you have any legal issue in Indonesia territory, contact us then, feel free in 24 hour, we will be happy to assist you. 

*) For further information please contact:

Mahmud Kusuma Advocate

Law Office

Jakarta - Indonesia.

E-mail: mahmudkusuma22@gmail.com

________________

References:

1. "Kronologi Kasus Penipuan Indosurya Rp 106 T, Terbesar di RI!", www.cnbcindonesia.com., Diakses pada tanggal 20 Mei 2023, Link: https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/market/20221226081011-17-399991/kronologi-kasus-penipuan-indosurya-rp-106-t-terbesar-di-ri

2. Ibid.

3. Ibid.

4. Ibid.

5. Ibid.

6. Ibid.

Contoh Surat Permohonan Penetapan Ahli Waris

 

(iStock)

Oleh:

Tim Hukumindo

Pada kesempatan yang lalu platform www.hukumindo.com telah membahas mengenai "Contoh Sederhana Kontra Memori Banding Pidana", "Contoh Permohonan Penetapan Waris" dan "Contoh Gugatan Waris", pada kesempatan ini akan dibahas mengenai 'Contoh Surat Permohonan Penetapan Ahli Waris'. Dengan demikian artikel ini adalah artikel kedua di platform www.hukumindo.com dalam artikel sejenis. Perhatikan contoh di bawah ini:[1]

Hal : Permohonan Penetapan Ahli Waris

Lamp : -

Kepada Yth.:

Ketua Pengadilan Pengadilan Agama Muara Tebo

Di,

    Pengadilan Agama Muara Tebo

    Jl. Lintas Tebo-Bungo Km 12

    Komplek Perkantoran Tebo

    Kelurahan Sungai Alai, Kecamatan Tebo Tengah, Kabupaten Tebo.

Dengan hormat,

Yang bertanda-tangan dibawah ini :

Nama : Agustiana Binti Sekata Bangun, Tempat & Tgl Lahir : Tanjung Langkat, 10 Agustus 1975, Jenis Kelamin : Perempuan, Umur : 43 Tahun, Agama : Islam, Pekerjaan : Ibu Rumah Tangga, Alamat : Jl. Matahari RT 10 RW 00 Desa Sungai Jernih, Kecamatan: Muara Tabir, Kabupaten Tebo.

Yang selanjutnya dalam perkara ini disebut sebagai …………………… Pemohon I

Nama : Dedi Guslan Bangun Bin Sekata Bangun, Tempat & Tgl Lahir: Medan, 05 Juni 1978, Jenis Kelamin : Laki-laki, Umur : 40 Tahun, Agama : Islam, Pekerjaan: Wiraswasta, Alamat: Jl. Nusa Indah RT 09 Desa Sungai Jernih, Kecamatan: Muara Tabir, Kabupaten Tebo.

Yang selanjutnya dalam perkara ini disebut sebagai ………………….. Pemohon II

Nama : Irwanta Bangun Bin Sekata Bangun, Tempat & Tgl Lahir : Tanjung Langkat, 02 Agustus 1979, Jenis Kelamin : Laki-laki, Umur : 39 Tahun, Agama : Islam, Pekerjaan: Tani, Alamat : Jl. Matahari RT 10 RW 00 Desa Sungai Jernih, Kecamatan Muara Tabir, Kabupaten Tebo.

Yang selanjutnya dalam perkara ini disebut sebagai …………………. Pemohon III

Nama : Ayu Siti Rahayu Binti Sekata Bangun, Tempat & Tgl Lahir : Medan, 12 Maret 1984, Jenis Kelamin : Perempuan, Umur: 34 Tahun, Agama : Islam, Pekerjaan: Ibu Rumah Tangga, Alamat: Jl. Mawar RT 05 Rw 05 Desa Sungai Jernih, Kecamatan Muara Tabir, Kabupaten Tebo.

Yang selanjutnya dalam perkara ini disebut sebagai …………………. Pemohon IV

Nama : Partini, Tempat & Tgl Lahir: Magetan, 08 Agustus 1968, Jenis Kelamin : Perempuan, Umur : 50 Tahun, Agama : Islam, Pekerjaan : Ibu Rumah Tangga, Alamat : Jl. Kamboja RT 04 RW 00 Desa Sungai Jernih, Kecamatan Muara Tabir, Kabupaten Tebo.

Yang selanjutnya dalam perkara ini disebut sebagai ……………. Turut Pemohon

Yang selanjutnya dalam hal ini Pemohon I s/d Pemohon IV memberikan kuasa kepada I S, S.H., R, S.H. Z, S.H. I, S.H.I., M.H. selaku Advokat/Pengacara yang tergabung pada kantor Advokat “IRZI”, yang beralamat kantor di Jl. Teuku Umar, Kelurahan: Pasir Putih, Kecamatan: Rimbo Tengah, Kabupaten Tebo, berdasarkan surat kuasa khusus nomor;  012/SKK/Pdt.Hon/PAH/IRZI/XI/2019 tanggal 19 November 2019, yang selanjutnya disebut sebagai Pemohon dan secara bersama-sama disebut sebagai……………………Para Pemohon

Dengan ini hendak mengajukan Permohonan Penetapan Ahli Waris dari Pewaris yang bernama Sekata Bangun Bin Nuranggi.

Adapun yang menjadi dasar/alasan dari Permohonan Penetapan Ahli Waris tersebut adalah sebagai berikut:

1. Bahwa pada tanggal 23 Februari 2018 telah meninggal dunia ayah kandung dari Para Pemohon yang bernama Sekata Bangun di Rumah Sakit karena sakit dan dalam keadaan beragama Islam, tempat tinggal terakhir di Jl. Matahari RT 10 RW 00 sesuai Surat Keterangan Kematian No.474.3/05/sj/2019 tertanggal 25 April 2019 yang dikeluarkan oleh Desa Sungai Jernih (Bukti P-1).

2. Bahwa, semasa hidupnya Almarhum Sekata Bangun pernah menikah dengan seorang perempuan yang bernama Nur Asni alias Upik dan telah lahir 3 (Tiga) orang anak yaitu:

2.1. Nama : Agustiana Binti Sekata Bangun, Tempat & Tgl Lahir : Tanjung Langkat, 10 Agustus 1975, Jenis Kelamin : Perempuan, Umur : 43 Tahun, Agama : Islam, Pekerjaan : Ibu Rumah Tangga, Alamat : Jl. Matahari RT 10 RW 00 Desa Sungai Jernih, Kecamatan: Muara Tabir, Kabupaten Tebo.

2.2. Nama : Dedi Guslan Bangun Bin Sekata Bangun, Tempat & Tgl Lahir: Medan, 05 Juni 1978, Jenis Kelamin : Laki-laki, Umur : 40 Tahun, Agama : Islam, Pekerjaan: Wiraswasta, Alamat: Jl. Nusa Indah RT 09 Desa Sungai Jernih, Kecamatan: Muara Tabir, Kabupaten Tebo.

2.3. Nama : Irwanta Bangun Bin Sekata Bangun, Tempat & Tgl Lahir : Tanjung Langkat, 02 Agustus 1979, Jenis Kelamin : Laki-laki, Umur : 39 Tahun, Agama : Islam, Pekerjaan: Tani, Alamat : Jl. Matahari RT 10 RW 00 Desa Sungai Jernih, Kecamatan Muara Tabir, Kabupaten Tebo.

3. Namun perkawinan antara Almarhum Sekata Bangun dan Nur Asni berakhir dengan perceraian disaat anak-anak tersebut diatas belum dewasa.

4. Bahwa setelah almarhum Sekata Bangun dan Nur Asni bercerai, selanjutnya almarhum Sekata Bangun menikah dengan seorang perempuan yang bernama Suli dan telah melahirkan 1 (satu) orang anak perempuan yaitu:

Nama : Ayu Siti Rahayu Binti Sekata Bangun, Tempat & Tgl Lahir: Medan, 12 Maret 1984, Jenis Kelamin : Perempuan, Umur : 34 Tahun, Agama : Islam, Pekerjaan : Ibu Rumah Tangga, Alamat: Jl. Mawar RT 05 Rw 05 Desa Sungai Jernih, Kecamatan Muara Tabir, Kabupaten Tebo.

5. Namun Almarhum Sekata Bangun meninggalkan Suli begitu saja seorang diri dan belakangan diketahui Almarhum Sekata Bangun telah hidup bersama dengan seorang perempuan yang bernama Fiahna Boru Sitepu, namun tidak seorangpun yang tahu antara almarhum Sekata Bangun dengan Fiahna Boru Sitepu telah terikat dalam suatu perkawinan sah yang menurut hukum atau tidak, baik keluarga maupun Para Pemohon tidak mengetahuinya dan tidak pernah mendengar kabar tentang hal itu. Bahwa almarhum Sekata Bangun dengan Fiahna Boru Sitepu selama menjalin hidup bersama, tidak melahirkan anak atau tidak memiliki keturunan, dan saat ini baik Suli maupun Fiahna Boru Sitepu telah meninggal dunia.

6. Bahwa selanjutnya setelah meninggalnya almarhumah Fiahna Boru Sitepu pada tanggal 02 September 2015, almarhum Sekata Bangun telah menikah dengan seorang perempuan yang bernam Partini Binti Somoran pada 25 Mei 2016 dan dalam perkawinan ini antara almarhum Sekata Bangun dengan Partini tidak melahirkan anak atau tidak memiliki keturunan.

7. Bahwa selama pernikahan antara almarhum Sekata Bangun dengan Nur Asni dan almarhumah Suli, sekira tahun 1987 almarhum Sekata Bangun menjual tapak rumah ukuran 12 x 15 di Kecamatan Salapian Kabupaten Langkat kepada kakak kandungnya yang bernama Rizman Bangun. Kemudian hasil penjualan tapak rumah tersebut dibawa ke Jambi dan dibelikan tanah kebun di Muara Tabir, yang kemudian berkembang dan menghasilkan harta diantaranya:

8. Satu unit rumah yang terletak di Perumahan Kota Baru Indah, Kecamatan Alam Barajo, Kota Jambi, Provinsi Jambi, dengan SHM Nomor 11891 Tahun 2005 atas nama Sekata Bangun. (Bukti P-2)

9. Bahwa saat ini harta peninggalan berupa satu unit rumah tersebut dalam kondisi kosong dan tidak terawat dengan baik.

10. Bahwa tujuan Para Pemohon mengajukan permohonan ini agar Para Pemohon ditetapkan sebagai Ahli Waris dari Almarhum Sekata Bangun dan selanjutnya sebagai Ahli Waris yang sah dapat bertindak secara sah secara hukum atas segala tindakan untuk dan atas nama Almarhum Sekata Bangun baik mengenai pengurusan peralihan hak terhadap segala aset yang dimiliki termasuk tidak terbatas pada penandatanganan surat-surat khususnya dalam hal jual beli dan/atau balik nama terhadap harta peninggalan berupa Satu unit rumah yang terletak di Perumahan Kota Baru Indah, Kecamatan Alam Barajo, Kota Jambi, Provinsi Jambi, dengan SHM Nomor 11891 Tahun 2005 atas nama Sekata Bangun.

11. Bahwa berdasarkan fakta hukum tersebut diatas, Para Pemohon mempunyai hubungan darah dengan almarhum Sekata Bangun, seluruhnya beragama beragama Islam dan tidak terhalang karena hukum untuk menjadi ahli waris.

12. Bahwa atas dasar hal-hal sebagaimana tersebut diatas, cukup beralasan bagi Para Pemohon mengajukan Permohonan Penetapan Ahli Waris ini, dan mohon agar sekiranya Pengadilan Agama Muara Tebo berkenan menetapkan Para Pemohon sebagai Ahli Waris dari alamarhum Sekata Bangun.

13. Bahwa Pemohon sanggup untuk membayar biaya permohonan ini sesuai hukum yang berlaku.

Berdasarkan hal-hal tersebut diatas mohon kepada Ketua Pengadilan Agama Muara Tebo Cq. Hakim yang memeriksa permohonan ini kiranya berkenan menjatuhkan penetapan yang amarnya sebagai berikut:

Permohonan:

1. Mengabulkan permohonan Pemohon untuk seluruhnya.

2. Menetapkan :

2.1. Nama : Agustiana Binti Sekata Bangun, Tempat & Tgl Lahir : Tanjung Langkat, 10 Agustus 1975, Jenis Kelamin : Perempuan, Umur : 43 Tahun, Agama : Islam, Pekerjaan : Ibu Rumah Tangga, Alamat : Jl. Matahari RT 10 RW 00 Desa Sungai Jernih, Kecamatan: Muara Tabir, Kabupaten Tebo.

2.2. Nama : Dedi Guslan Bangun Bin Sekata Bangun, Tempat & Tgl Lahir: Medan, 05 Juni 1978, Jenis Kelamin : Laki-laki, Umur : 40 Tahun, Agama : Islam, Pekerjaan: Wiraswasta, Alamat: Jl. Nusa Indah RT 09 Desa Sungai Jernih, Kecamatan: Muara Tabir, Kabupaten Tebo.

2.3. Nama : Irwanta Bangun Bin Sekata Bangun, Tempat & Tgl Lahir : Tanjung Langkat, 02 Agustus 1979, Jenis Kelamin : Laki-laki, Umur : 39 Tahun, Agama : Islam, Pekerjaan: Tani, Alamat : Jl. Matahari RT 10 RW 00 Desa Sungai Jernih, Kecamatan Muara Tabir, Kabupaten Tebo.

2.4. Nama : Ayu Siti Rahayu Binti Sekata Bangun, Tempat & Tgl Lahir : Medan, 12 Maret 1984, Jenis Kelamin : Perempuan, Umur: 34 Tahun, Agama : Islam, Pekerjaan: Ibu Rumah Tangga, Alamat: Jl. Mawar RT 05 Rw 05 Desa Sungai Jernih, Kecamatan Muara Tabir, Kabupaten Tebo.

2.5. Nama : Partini, Tempat & Tgl Lahir: Magetan, 08 Agustus 1968, Jenis Kelamin : Perempuan, Umur : 50 Tahun, Agama : Islam, Pekerjaan : Ibu Rumah Tangga, Alamat : Jl. Kamboja RT 04 RW 00 Desa Sungai Jernih, Kecamatan Muara Tabir, Kabupaten Tebo.

Adalah Ahli Waris dari Almarhum Sekata Bangun.

3. Menyatakan Pemohon I, Pemohon II, Pemohon III, Pemohon IV, sah secara hukum atas segala tindakan baik perawatan, pengelolaan, renovasi, dan tindakan lainya yang diperlukan terhadap harta peninggalan almarhum Sekata Bangun berupa Satu unit rumah yang terletak di Perumahan Kota Baru Indah, Kecamatan Alam Barajo, Kota Jambi, Provinsi Jambi, dengan SHM Nomor 11891 Tahun  2005 atas nama Sekata Bangun.

4. Memberikan ijin kepada Pemohon I, Pemohon II, Pemohon III, Pemohon IV untuk melakukan peralihan hak jual beli termasuk tetapi tidak terbatas pada penandatanganan surat-surat dan/atau balik nama, terhadap harta peninggalan almarhum Sekata Bangun berupa Satu unit rumah yang terletak di Perumahan Kota Baru Indah, Kecamatan Alam Barajo, Kota Jambi, Provinsi Jambi, dengan SHM Nomor 11891 Tahun 2005 atas nama Sekata Bangun.

5. Membebankan biaya permohonan ini menurut hukum

Subsider

Apabila Majelis Hakim berpendapat lain, mohon penetapan yang seadil-adilnya.

Demikian surat permohonan ini kami sampaikan. Atas perhatian Ketua Pengadilan Agama Muara Tebo Cq.  Hakim yang memeriksa dan mengadili. Kami Kuasa Hukum pemohon mengucapkan banyak terima kasih.

Hormat kami,

Kuasa Hukum Pemohon

 

Ttd.

I S, S.H.

Jika kita bandingkan dengan contoh yang sebelumnya, penulis berpendapat bahwa artikel terakhir ini mempunyai kompleksitas posisi perkara yang berbeda. Bagaimana menurut sidang pembaca? 

____________________

Reference:

1. "Contoh Surat Permohonan Penetapan Ahli Waris", www.indrasatrianis.com., Indra Setiawan, December 5, 2020, Diakses pada tanggal 20 Mei 2023, Link: https://www.indrasatrianis.com/2020/12/05/contoh-surat-permohonan-penetapan-ahli-waris/

Contoh Sederhana Kontra Memori Banding Pidana

 

(iStock)

Oleh:

Tim Hukumindo

Pada kesempatan yang lalu platform www.hukumindo.com telah membahas mengenai "Contoh Sederhana Kontra Memori Kasasi Pidana", "Contoh Memori Peninjauan Kembali (PK) Pidana" dan "Contoh Surat Kuasa Peninjauan Kembali (PK) Kasus Pidana", pada kesempatan ini akan dibahas mengenai 'Contoh Sederhana Kontra Memori Banding Pidana'.

PRO JUSTITIA

Kejaksaan Negeri Malang

Kejaksaan Negeri Malang

Jalan Simpang Panji Suroso, Polowijen, Blimbing, Kota Malang, Jawa Timur.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

KONTRA MEMORI BANDING

Malang, 15 Maret 2017

Kepada  Yth.

Ketua Pengadilan Tinggi Surabaya

Melalui Kepaniteraan Pengadilan Negeri Malang

di-

     Malang.

Dengan hormat,

Perkenankanlah Saya, Nuriza Ayu Ningtiyas, S.H., M.H. selaku Penuntut Umum yang menangani perkara dengan Nomor Registrasi Perkara: PDN-12/ PN.MLG/ 9/ 2016 pada Pengadilan Negeri Malang untuk mengajukan kontra Memori Banding terhadap Terdakwa Eren Indra Paripurna yang diwakili oleh Advokat Terdakwa, yaitu Winda Astabela, S.H., M.H. pada tanggal 10 Maret 2017.

Bahwa berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Malang No. 1002/ Pid.B/ 2017/ PN.MLG tertanggal 25 Februari 2017 dengan amar putusan sebagai berikut:

a. Menyatakan Terdakwa Eren Indra Paripurna telah terbukti secara sah dan meyakinkan telah melakukan tindak pidana sebagaimana dimaksud dalam Pasal 340 KUHP tentang Pembunuhan Berencana.

b. Memerintahkan Terdakwa Eren Indra Paripurna ditahan di Rumah Tahanan Negara selama 12 tahun.

c. Memerintahkan barang bukti berupa:

- 1(satu) buah senjata tajam berukuran sedang berupa sangkur untuk segera dimusnahkan;

- 1(satu) helai baju kaos yang digunakan korban pada saat kejadian untuk dimusnahkan.

d. Membebankan biaya perkara kepada Negara sejumlah Rp. 306.000,-(tiga ratus enam ribu rupiah).

Bahwa, setelah membaca Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Malang No. 1002/ Pid.B/ 2017/ PN.MLG tertanggal 25 Februari 2017, Saya menyampaikan Kontra Memori Banding dengan alasan-alasan hukum sebagai berikut:

Bahwa dari fakta-fakta hukum yang diperoleh dalam sidang mengenai peristiwa sebagaimana diuraikan diatas, maka dapatlah dianalisis hukumnya sebagai berikut.

• Bahwa terhadap Terdakwa telah didakwa dengan dakwaan tunggal melanggar Pasal 340 KUHP

• Bahwa pasal 340 KUHP merumuskan selengkapnya sebagai berikut.

“Barangsiapa sengaja dan dengan rencana terlebih dahulu merampas nyawa orang lain, diancam karena pembunuhan dengan rencana, dengan pidana mati atau pidana penjara seumur hidup atau selama tertentu, paling lama dua puluh tahun”.

• Bahwa dari rumusan tersebut diatas, maka kejahatan pembunuhan berencana tersebut terdapat unsure-unsur sebagai berikut.

Unsur-unsur yang bersifat obyektif

a. Perbuatan : membunuh

b. Obyeknya : Nyawa seseorang

c. Caranya : dengan menggunakan sangkur.

Unsur-unsur  yang bersifat subyektif

d. Dengan sengaja;

e. Merampas nyawa orang lain, diancam karena pembunuhan dengan rencana.

Untuk membuktikan bahwa terdakwa telah melakukan kejahatan pembunuhan berencana, maka semua unsure pembunuhan berencana tersebut harus terbukti adanya dalam peristiwa tanggal 9 Oktober 2016 di dekat jembatan Dieng.

Kini Saya (JPU) akan menganalisis unsur-unsur pasal 340 KUHP tersebut dengan mencocokannya dengan fakta-fakta yang diperoleh dalam sidang sebagai berikut.

 

Bahwa untuk menyingkat pembahasan,maka dalam uraian mengenai analisis hukum di sini,beberapa unsur akan di gabung dalam beberapa pembahasan sebagai berikut.

a. Perbuatan Membunuh

Membunuh dalam KUHP adalah kesengajaan menghilangkan nyawa milik orag lain. Dengan cara apapun apabila seseorang dengan sengaja menghilangkan nyawa milik orang lain maka masuk dalam delik pembunuhan.

Fakta-fakta hukum yang ada telah membuktikan bahwa perbuatan terdakwa telah memenuhi unsur-unsut tersebut,yang uraiannya sebagai berikut.

• Perbuatan yang menyebabkan hilangnya nyawa milik orang lain ini dilakukan oleh terdakwa Eren Indra Paripurna terbukti benardari saksi Yoakim Bata Bete,Rifa’i makatita menyatakan telah melihat terdkwa dengan jelas membawa korban dengan keadaan berdarah dan terdakwa saat itu membawa sangkur yang telah terdakwa siapkan sebelumnya dengan tujuan memang untuk membunuh korban menggunakan sangkur tersebut dan Saksi Alhli Razib satria Pamungkassesuai dengan keilmuannya menyatakan bahwa korban mati karena di tusuk sebnyak 7 kali dan tusukan itu di sengaja.pembunuhan ini dilatarblakangi karena terdakwa geram karena korban menagih utang kepada terdakwa,untuk lari dari hutangnya dengan sengaja terdakwa merencanakan pembunuhan tersebut terjadi pada tanggal 9 November 2016 di jembatan Dieng.

• Perbuatan yang dengan sengaja dan dengan rencana terlebih dahuu untuk menghilangkan nyawa milik orang lain yang dilakukan terdakwa terhadap korban merupakan perbuatan yang dilarang seperti yang dimkud dalam pasal 340 KUHP.

• Objek: Nyawa seeorang yaitu korban yang bernam Jono

• Bahwa dari laporan ketua RT.002 Simpang Mega Mendung Kec.sukun Kel.Pisang candi Kota malang atas di temukannya mayat korban yang dibunuh oleh terdakwa pada polisi dengan terbiltnya LP No.000111333 tanggal 11 November 2016

b. Unsur: Caranya Dengan Menggunakan Sangkur

• Bahwa perbuatan yang dilakukan oleh terdakwa yanitu menghilangkan nyawa milik Korban yang bernama Jono dengan cara menusuk Korban menggunakan Sangkur yang berukuran sedang.

• Bahwa seseorang yang telah hilang nyawanya adalah Jono.

c. Unsur Dengan Sengaja

• Bahwa arti sengaja adalah menghendaki dan mengetahui (Moeljatno,Azas-azas Hukum Pidana,1983:177). Apabila di hubungkan dengan perbuatan tertentu,maka sengaja artinga orang yang menghendaki untuk mewujudkan perbuatan itu. Sedangkan jika dihubungkan dengan sengaja dalam padal 340 KUHP, sengaja itu  harus dibuktikan bahwa si pembuat menghendaki hilangnya nyawa milik seseorang dengan sadar bahwa setelah perbuatanya itu seseorang menjadi hilang nyawanya.

• Bahwa dengan kejadian ini telah terbukti bahwa terdakwa menhilangkan nyawa milik korban yang bernama jono dengan sengaj dan niat juga pembunuhan telah direncanakan sebelumnya melihat telah disediakannya sangkur yang di gunakan untuk membunuh korban di jembatan dieng tersebut.

d. Unsur: Merampas Nyawa Orang Lain, Diancam Karena Pembunuhan Dengan Rencana.

• Bahwa maksud terdakwa menghilangkan nyawa milik korban tersebut karena geram terhadap korban yang selalu menagih utang dan maarah-marah juga agar terdakwa tidak perlu lagi membayar hutang kepada korban.

• Bahwa terdakwa telah merencanakan pembunuhan terhadap korban terlebih dahulu,terbukti telah tersedianya sangkur dan waktu pembunuhan yang sudah sangat malam.

Berdasarkan alasan-alasan sebagaimana tersebut di atas, maka Penuntut Umum mohon kepada Ketua Pengadilan Tinggi Surabaya Cq. Majelis Hakim yang memeriksa perkara ini untuk memberikan putusan sebagai berikut:

1. Menyatakan menolak permohonan memori banding Terdakwa untuk seluruhnya;

2. Menyatakan menerima kontra memori banding Penuntut Umum untuk seluruhnya;

3. Menyatakan Terdakwa terbukti bersalah menurut Pasal 340 sesuai Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Malang  ;

4. Menyatakan Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Malang  No.1002/ Pid.B/ 2017/ PN.MLG tertanggal 25 Februari 2017 untuk tetap dilaksanakan;

5. Membebankan biaya perkara kepada Negara.

Demikian Kontra Memori Banding yang telah Saya buat. Atas perhatiannya, Saya sampaikan terima kasih.

Hormat Penuntut Umum,

Ttd.

Nuriza Ayu Ningtiyas, S.H., M.H.

Jaksa Muda NIP. 344.XXY.099

Bagaimana menurut sidang pembaca terkait dengan Contoh Sederhana Kontra Memori Banding Pidana di atas? 

____________________

Reference:

1. "Contoh Kontra Memori Banding", www.academia.edu., Diakses pada tanggal 17 Mei 2023, Link: https://www.academia.edu/38875786/Contoh_KONTRA_MEMORI_BANDING_15_maret