Indonesia and Australia Agree on Joint Security Treaty

(iStock)

By:

Team of Hukumindo

Previously, the www.hukumindo.com platform has talk about "After Winning a Lawsuit Against His Son, a 97-year-old Man Can Legally Remarry", "Former Indian Police Officer Released After Serving 30 Years", you may read also "UN Secretary-General: 'The law of the jungle' has replaced international law" and on this occasion we will discuss about 'Indonesia and Australia Agree on Joint Security Treaty'.

The President of the Republic of Indonesia, Prabowo Subianto, received a working visit from the Prime Minister of Australia, Anthony Albanese, at the Merdeka Palace, Jakarta, on Friday (6/2/2026). This visit resulted in the signing of the Joint Security Treaty as an effort to maintain peace in the Indo-Pacific region. "This joint security agreement reflects the determination of both countries to continue to work closely together in maintaining their respective national security, as well as to make a real contribution to the peace and stability of the Indo-Pacific region. For Indonesia, this reflects a firm commitment to the principle of good neighborliness and our independent and active foreign policy," stated President Prabowo. Meanwhile, PM Albanese added that the signing of this agreement is a continuation of a long process that began with a bilateral meeting in Sydney, in November last year. The newly agreed Joint Security Treaty emphasizes strengthening bilateral consultation mechanisms that include a regular consultation forum for heads of state to discuss regional and global security situations, following up on the Defense Cooperation Agreement that Indonesia and Australia have agreed to since 2006.[1]

In addition, the two countries also opened up opportunities to strengthen cooperation, including military education exchanges, the development of joint training facilities, and the placement of senior Indonesian officers in the Australian Defense Force. Indonesian Foreign Minister Sugiono underscored the urgency of strengthening collaboration and intensive communication with countries in the region to mitigate various challenges, in line with the principles of good neighborly diplomacy. "So in a situation like this, communication and collaboration are essential. Therefore, a common understanding of the global situation is needed," said Foreign Minister Sugiono. Furthermore, Foreign Minister Sugiono emphasized that this treaty is not a binding military defense pact, but rather a constructive consultation forum. Foreign Minister Sugiono added that this type of consultation mechanism is a common practice in Indonesian diplomacy, as is the consultation forum Indonesia has with other partner countries.[2] And if you have any legal issue in Indonesia territory, contact us for business inquiry, feel free in 24 hour, we will be glad to assist you. 

*) For further information please contact:

Mahmud Kusuma Advocate

Law Office

Jakarta - Indonesia.

E-mail: mahmudkusuma22@gmail.com

________________

References:

1. "Indonesia-Australia Sepakati Traktat Keamanan Bersama", www.kemlu.go.id., 9 Februari 2026, Diakses pada tanggal 16 Februari 2026, Link: https://kemlu.go.id/berita/indonesia-australia-sepakati-traktat-keamanan-bersama?type=publication

2. Ibid.

After Winning a Lawsuit Against His Son, a 97-year-old Man Can Legally Remarry

(iStock)

By:

Team of Hukumindo

Previously, the www.hukumindo.com platform has talk about "Former Indian Police Officer Released After Serving 30 Years", "UN Secretary-General: 'The law of the jungle' has replaced international law", you may read also "12 Mile, a Biopic of Mochtar Kusumaatmadja" and on this occasion we will discuss about 'After Winning a Lawsuit Against His Son, a 97-year-old Man Can Legally Remarry'.

This love story comes from across the border in Singapore. An elderly man won a lawsuit after his biological son tried to prevent him from remarrying. The son believed his father was mentally incompetent, while the grandfather believed he was still healthy and had the right to make his own life choices.[1]

The man was known to have married in 1950 and had three children. However, in 1971, he had an illicit relationship with his secretary, resulting in the birth of another child. Despite this, his wife remained by his side until her death in 2014. Two years after her death, his longtime girlfriend moved in with him. Their relationship had actually lasted for decades. Problems began to arise in 2021, when the grandfather announced plans to officially marry the woman.[2]

Upon hearing the news, his second son filed a lawsuit in family court. He asked the judge to declare his father legally incompetent. The reasoning was that his father was said to be suffering from dementia after a fall in 2017 and was allegedly easily manipulated by his girlfriend. During the trial, medical evidence showed that the 97-year-old did indeed experience some short-term memory loss due to age. However, doctors confirmed that he was still in good enough condition to make important decisions, including those regarding marriage and property.[3] And if you have any legal issue in Indonesia territory, contact us for business inquiry, feel free in 24 hour, we will be glad to assist you. 

*) For further information please contact:

Mahmud Kusuma Advocate

Law Office

Jakarta - Indonesia.

E-mail: mahmudkusuma22@gmail.com

________________

References:

1. "Kisah Cinta Kakek 97 Tahun: Menang Gugatan Lawan Anak Demi Nikah Lagi", wolipop.detik.com, Vina Oktiani, 9 Februari 2026, Diakses pada tanggal 10 Februari 2026, Link: https://wolipop.detik.com/wedding-news/d-8347493/kisah-cinta-kakek-97-tahun-menang-gugatan-lawan-anak-demi-nikah-lagi

2. Ibid.

3. Ibid.

Former Indian Police Officer Released After Serving 30 Years

(iStock)

By:

Team of Hukumindo

Previously, the www.hukumindo.com platform has talk about "UN Secretary-General: 'The law of the jungle' has replaced international law", "12 Mile, a Biopic of Mochtar Kusumaatmadja", you may read also "Legal Dispute Over Lava Treasure Discovery" and on this occasion we will discuss about 'Former Indian Police Officer Released After Serving 30 Years'.

A former police officer in Gujarat, India, was released after serving about 30 years in prison on charges of accepting a bribe of 20 rupees or around IDR. 3,700. He was released after the court finally declared him not guilty, but he died the next day. Babubhai Prajapati (64) had spent about 30 years behind bars after being convicted in 1996 on charges of accepting a bribe of 20 rupees from a truck driver. His case dragged on in the legal system for decades, with his appeal pending for 22 years before the Gujarat High Court acquitted him last Wednesday.[1]

Prajapati died on Thursday or a day after the long-awaited court ruling to clear his name. The verdict, as well as his death, has tragically ended a protracted legal battle that lasted almost his entire adult life. Prajapati's family and local lawyers have not spoken publicly about his death or the pending legal or compensation efforts, but his story has been widely shared as a stark example of the human consequences associated with a slow criminal appeals process.[2] And if you have any legal issue in Indonesia territory, contact us for business inquiry, feel free in 24 hour, we will be glad to assist you. 

*) For further information please contact:

Mahmud Kusuma Advocate

Law Office

Jakarta - Indonesia.

E-mail: mahmudkusuma22@gmail.com

________________

References:

1. "Eks Polisi Ini Dibebaskan usai 30 Tahun Dipenjara atas Suap Rp3.700, tapi Esok Harinya Meninggal", www.sindonews.com, Muhaimin, 08 Februari 2026, Diakses pada tanggal 9 Februari 2026, Link: https://international.sindonews.com/read/1674789/46/eks-polisi-ini-dibebaskan-usai-30-tahun-dipenjara-atas-suap-rp3700-tapi-esok-harinya-meninggal-1770519777/5

2. Ibid.

UN Secretary-General: 'The law of the jungle' has replaced international law

 

(iStock)

By:

Team of Hukumindo

Previously, the www.hukumindo.com platform has talk about "12 Mile, a Biopic of Mochtar Kusumaatmadja", "Legal Dispute Over Lava Treasure Discovery", you may read also "Contoh Surat Perjanjian Sewa Peralatan Konstruksi" and on this occasion we will discuss about 'UN Secretary-General: 'The law of the jungle' has replaced international law'.

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres warned that the global order is being eroded as the rule of international law is being replaced by what he called the “law of the jungle.” While urging a renewed commitment to multilateralism and accountability, Guterres asserted that “the rule of law is the foundation of global peace and security” during the UN Security Council’s open debate entitled “Reaffirming the Rule of International Law: A Path to Re-Enforcing Peace, Justice and Multilateralism.” The Portuguese politician recalled that in 2024, UN member states adopted a “Pact for the Future,” which included a commitment “to act in accordance with international law and fulfill obligations in good faith,” but he warned that “words are not being matched by actions.”[1]

“Around the world, the rule of law is being replaced by the law of the jungle,” he said. “We are seeing flagrant violations of international law and a brazen disregard for the UN Charter.” Referring to conflicts “from Gaza to Ukraine, from the Sahel to Myanmar, in Venezuela and elsewhere,” he stressed that “law enforcement is being treated like an à la carte menu.” He emphasized that countries are violating international law “with impunity” through “illegal use of force, targeting of civilian infrastructure, human rights violations and abuses, illegal development of nuclear weapons, unconstitutional changes of government, and a blanket approach to life-saving humanitarian aid.” “These violations are setting a dangerous precedent, encouraging other countries to do what they want, rather than what international law requires,” he warned.[2] And if you have any legal issue in Indonesia territory, contact us for business inquiry, feel free in 24 hour, we will be glad to assist you. 

*) For further information please contact:

Mahmud Kusuma Advocate

Law Office

Jakarta - Indonesia.

E-mail: mahmudkusuma22@gmail.com

________________

References:

1. "Sekjen PBB: Hukum Internasional Digantikan oleh Hukum Rimba!", tempo.co, 27 Januari 2026, Diakses pada tanggal 6 Februari 2026, Link: https://www.tempo.co/internasional/sekjen-pbb-hukum-internasional-digantikan-oleh-hukum-rimba--2110250

2. Ibid.

12 Mile, a Biopic of Mochtar Kusumaatmadja

  

(en.qdnd.vn/)

By:

Team of Hukumindo

Previously, the www.hukumindo.com platform has talk about "Legal Dispute Over Lava Treasure Discovery", "Contoh Surat Perjanjian Sewa Peralatan Konstruksi", you may read also "Employee Fired for Refusing to Attend Office Party Deemed Boring" and on this occasion we will discuss about '12 Mile, a Biopic of Mochtar Kusumaatmadja'.

The film "12 Mile: Guiding the Archipelago," produced by MAI Productions, depicts the struggle of the late Foreign Minister and national hero, Mochtar Kusumaatmadja, in establishing an archipelagic state and the Indonesian Archipelago Outlook as a concept accepted by international law. According to "12 Mile" director Tubagus Deddy, while older generations may only remember Mochtar from his time as foreign minister on TVRI, he remains a lesser-known hero to the younger generation. "Even before, we didn't know what he did to become a national hero. However, after researching, it turned out that Mochtar's thoughts, despite his simplicity, were of international caliber," Deddy said at a press conference ahead of the exclusive screening of "12 Mile" in Central Jakarta on Wednesday evening.[1]

He explained that the premise of the film stems from Indonesia's 25-year diplomatic struggle to realize the concept of an archipelagic state, from being opposed by major countries to being recognized by the world through UNCLOS 1982. It also shows Mochtar's position as both a skilled diplomat and a father and head of the family in the film. Deddy said that one of the challenges in making the film "12 Mile" was translating the basic concepts of international maritime laws into an audiovisual form that could be accepted by the audience. The reason is, the concept of maritime law that Mochtar fought for throughout his life might be too complicated for the audience if presented simply, said the director who was also involved as a scriptwriter in the film "Ancika" (2024).[2] And if you have any legal issue in Indonesia territory, contact us for business inquiry, feel free in 24 hour, we will be glad to assist you. 

*) For further information please contact:

Mahmud Kusuma Advocate

Law Office

Jakarta - Indonesia.

E-mail: mahmudkusuma22@gmail.com

________________

References:

1. "Film "12 Mile" tampilkan perjuangan Mochtar bagi negara kepulauan", www.antaranews.com.,  5 Februari 2026, Diakses pada tanggal 5 Februari 2026, Link: https://www.antaranews.com/berita/5396970/film-12-mile-tampilkan-perjuangan-mochtar-bagi-negara-kepulauan

2. Ibid.

Legal Dispute Over Lava Treasure Discovery

(iStock)

By:

Team of Hukumindo

Previously, the www.hukumindo.com platform has talk about "Contoh Surat Perjanjian Sewa Peralatan Konstruksi", "Employee Fired for Refusing to Attend Office Party Deemed Boring", you may read also "Indonesia Joins Peace Council to End Gaza Conflict" and on this occasion we will discuss about 'Legal Dispute Over Lava Treasure Discovery'.

The story begins nearly four decades ago, when Felix, his twin sister Ange Biancamaria, and Marc Cotoni, were diving for sea urchins in the waters west of Corsica. Félix Biancamaria, a diver who in 1985 discovered a Roman treasure worth millions of euros. Unexpectedly, they found hundreds of rare gold coins from the 3rd century AD, complete with a Roman gold plate now estimated to be worth up to 8 million euros or around Rp. 160 billion. The find is known as the "Lava Treasure" and is believed to consist of up to thousands of gold coins minted during the reigns of four Roman emperors, including Gallienus and Aurelianus. Experts call it one of the most important monetary treasures from the 3rd century AD ever discovered.[1]

Initially, the coins were sold discreetly at low prices. However, the sale of several rare coins to mainland France attracted the attention of the international numismatic community. Claims that the coins were family heirlooms were eventually debunked after authorities discovered a pattern of repeated dives and the finders' surge in wealth. In 1986, the appearance of dozens of rare aurei on the auction market aroused public suspicion. However, much of the treasure has since been dispersed to private collections in various countries. The total Lava treasure is estimated at up to 1,400 coins and gold medallions, but only 83 have been recovered.[2]

This accidental discovery at the bottom of the Mediterranean Sea turned into a major legal case that landed Félix Biancamaria in court. Felix had been convicted in 1994 for selling some of the gold coins. However, the existence of the gold plates was only revealed in 2010, when he was arrested at Charles de Gaulle Airport in Paris, carrying the historical objects in his bag. Authorities believed he was trying to sell them illegally, and he was tried on charges of smuggling French national treasures. In France, all treasure found at the bottom of the sea belongs to the state.[3] And if you have any legal issue in Indonesia territory, contact us for business inquiry, feel free in 24 hour, we will be glad to assist you. 

*) For further information please contact:

Mahmud Kusuma Advocate

Law Office

Jakarta - Indonesia.

E-mail: mahmudkusuma22@gmail.com

________________

References:

1. "Cari Bulu Babi Ketemu Harta Karun Rp 160 Miliar, Malah Diburu Interpol", www.cnbcindonesia.com, Intan Rakhmayanti, CNBC Indonesia, 30 Januari 2026, Diakses pada tanggal 2 Februari 2026, Link: https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/tech/20260130145132-37-706762/cari-bulu-babi-ketemu-harta-karun-rp-160-miliar-malah-diburu-interpol

2. Ibid.

3. Ibid.

Contoh Surat Perjanjian Sewa Peralatan Konstruksi

(iStock)

Oleh:

Tim Hukumindo

Dalam perkuliahan sebelumnya platform www.hukumindo.com telah membahas mengenai "Employee Fired for Refusing to Attend Office Party Deemed Boring", "Indonesia Joins Peace Council to End Gaza Conflict", silahkan dibaca juga mengenai "Indonesia Extradites Russian Citizens" dan pada kesempatan ini akan dibahas perihal 'Contoh Surat Perjanjian Sewa Peralatan Konstruksi'.

Berikut contoh dimaksud:[1]

PERJANJIAN SEWA PERALATAN KONSTRUKSI

Nomor : ..................................................

Pada hari ini ........... tanggal yang bertanda tangan di bawah ini:

Nama : …..............................

NIK : ……..........................

Perusahaan : …..............................

NIB : …..............................

Jabatan : …..............................

Alamat : …..............................

Selanjutnya disebut sebagai Pemilik atau "Pihak Pertama".

Nama : …..............................

NIK : …..............................

Perusahaan : …..............................

NIB : …..............................

Jabatan : …..............................

Alamat : …..............................

Selanjutnya disebut sebagai Penyewa atau "Pihak Kedua".

Kedua belah Pihak sepakat untuk mengadakan perjanjian sewa peralatan konstruksi dengan ketentuan dan syarat yang diatur dalam pasal-pasal di bawah ini: 

Pasal 1

Spesifikasi, Lokasi Kerja dan Harga Sewa

1. Pihak Pertama bersedia menyewakan peralatan konstruksi kepada Pihak Kedua dan Pihak Kedua setuju untuk menyewa peralatan konstruksi kepada Pihak Pertama dengan spesifikasi sebagai berikut:

Peralatan konstruksi pertama

a. Nomor registrasi : ............................

b. Varian : ............................

c. Subvarian : ............................

d. Merk : ............................

e. Lokasi : ............................

Peralatan konstruksi kedua

a. Nomor registrasi : ............................

b. Varian : ............................

c. Subvarian : ............................

d. Merk : ............................

e. Lokasi : ............................

2. Harga sewa peralatan konstruksi di atas sudah nett, tanpa pemotongan pajak, dan kedua belah pihak setuju bahwa tarif sewa peralatan konstruksi pada Pasal 1 tidak akan berubah selama perjanjian belum berakhir.

3. Lokasi Kerja (site) Pihak Kedua berada di ............................

Pasal 2

Tempat, Waktu Dan Kondisi Penyerahan Peralatan Konstruksi

1. Tempat Penyerahan peralatan konstruksi di ...................

2. Pihak Pertama bersedia menyerahkan peralatan konstruksi pada Pihak Kedua di lokasi kerja dalam kondisi siap operasi sesuai Pasal 1 ayat 1 perjanjian ini setelah Pihak Kedua menyelesaikan pembayaran sesuai kesepakatan.

Pasal 3

Biaya Mobilisasi Dan Demobilisasi

1. Biaya Mobilisasi dan Demobilisasi ditanggung oleh Pihak Kedua baik dari pengambilan peralatan konstruksi hingga pengembalian peralatan konstruksi dan harus disetujui oleh Pihak Pertama.

2. Biaya Mobilisasi wajib dibayar di depan sebesar Rp. ....... X Unit = Rp. ..................(. Rupiah).

Pasal 4

Biaya Operasi, Biaya Pemeliharaan Dan Biaya Perbaikan Alat

1. Selama masa penyewaan peralatan konstruksi, keperluan oli, perbaikan kerusakan, pergantian spare part dan mekanik menjadi tanggung jawab Pihak Pertama.

2. Pemakaian BBM (Bahan Bakar Minyak) untuk keperluan operasi menjadi tanggung jawab Pihak Kedua.

Pasal 5

Operasi Operator

Kebutuhan operator menjadi tanggung jawab Pihak Kedua.

Pasal 6

Pembayaran Sewa

1. Pihak Kedua berkewajiban menyelesaikan pembayaran sewa di depan sebesar Rp. (….) rupiah serta ditambah dana mobilisasi/demobilisasi alat berat.

2. Dalam hal Pihak Kedua akan memperpanjang masa sewa peralatan konstruksi, maka harus memberitahukan kepada Pihak Pertama dalam jangka waktu 1 (satu) bulan sebelum masa perjanjian selesai

3. Apabila masa perjanjian selesai, maka Pihak Pertama berhak menarik atau mengambil kembali alatnya dari lokasi kerja (site) Pihak Kedua tanpa pemberitahuan apapun juga. 

Pasal 7

Keamanan peralatan konstruksi

1. Pihak Kedua wajib untuk menyediakan security, guna menjaga keamanan peralatan konstruksi di lokasi kerja (site).

2. Pihak Kedua wajib membayar ganti rugi terhadap peralatan konstruksi jika terjadi pencurian, kehilangan dan kerusakan dalam bentuk apapun yang dilakukan secara sengaja maupun tidak sengaja.

3. Apabila peralatan konstruksi mengalami kecelakaan pada saat di lokasi kerja, maka biaya yang timbul akibat hal tersebut menjadi tanggung jawab sepenuhnya dari Pihak Kedua.

4. Apabila terjadi kecelakaan kerja terhadap operator, maka seluruh biaya yang timbul akibat kecelakaan akan menjadi tanggung jawab Pihak Kedua.

Pasal 8

Masa Perjanjian

1. Perjanjian ini berlaku sejak ditanda tangani oleh Kedua Belah Pihak

2. Perjanjian ini akan diperpanjang kembali jika ada kesepakatan oleh Kedua Belah Pihak baik pembayaran maupun hal lainnya.

3. Perjanjian ini tetap berlaku apabila ada tambahan perpanjangan masa perjanjian, terkecuali ada item yang akan berubah dengan sendirinya seperti masalah mobilisasi peralatan konstruksi.

Pasal 9

Pemindahan, Pengambilan Dan Penggunaan peralatan konstruksi

1. Peralatan konstruksi tidak boleh dipindahkan oleh Pihak Kedua sebelum masa jam perjanjian belum habis, kecuali ada persetujuan dari Pihak Pertama.

2. Apabila Pihak Kedua akan menggunakan Peralatan konstruksi ke luar lokasi yang disebutkan di perjanjian ini, sedangkan masa perjanjian belum habis, maka Pihak Kedua harus memberitahukan kepada Pihak Pertama.

3. Tidak dibenarkan apabila Pihak Kedua merentalkan kembali/menyewakan kembali peralatan konstruksi Pihak Pertama kepada Pihak lain dan apabila terdapat hal tersebut, maka perjanjian ini putus dengan sendirinya dan semua biaya menjadi tanggung jawab Pihak Kedua kepada Pihak Pemakai dan Pihak Pertama akan menarik peralatan konstruksi dari lokasi Pihak Kedua tanpa pemberitahuan apapun dan semua pembayaran tidak dapat ditarik kembali oleh Pihak Kedua kepada Pihak Pertama. 

Pasal 10 

Perselisihan

1. Jika timbul perselisihan antara Pihak Pertama dengan Pihak Kedua, maka sebisa mungkin akan diselesaikan secara musyawarah dan kekeluargaan.

2. Apabila perselisihan tidak dapat diselesaikan secara musyawarah, maka kedua belah pihak sepakat untuk menyelesaikan masalah tersebut secara hukum yang berlaku.

3. Apabila terjadi kesalahpahaman di luar dari perjanjian, maka Pihak Kedua dianggap lalai dan tidak memahami isi dari perjanjian, dan Pihak Pertama tetap berpedoman pada perjanjian dalam menyelesaikan masalah.

Pasal 11 

Penutup

Demikian perjanjian sewa Peralatan konstruksi ini ditanda-tangani oleh Kedua Belah Pihak dalam rangkap 2 (dua), bermeterai cukup dan berkekuatan hukum yang sama dan dibuat tanpa paksaan serta tekanan dari pihak manapun.

………,

Pihak Pertama                                        Pihak Kedua

Ttd.                                                               Ttd.

(Pemilik)                                                (Penyewa)

________________

Referensi:

1. "SURAT PERJANJIAN SEWA PERALATAN KONSTRUKSI", ptbmr.co.id, PT. Bina Mitra Rancangbangun, Diakses pada tanggal 28 Januari 2026, Link: https://ptbmr.co.id/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/BMRKSFM1380-Surat-Perjanjian-Sewa-Peralatan-Konstruksi-SK-Dirjen-Binkon-PUPR-No-144-KPTS-DK-2022_Watermark.pdf

Employee Fired for Refusing to Attend Office Party Deemed Boring

(iStock)

By:

Team of Hukumindo

Previously, the www.hukumindo.com platform has talk about "Indonesia Joins Peace Council to End Gaza Conflict", "Indonesia Extradites Russian Citizens", you may read also "A Farmer in Madiun Faces Criminal Charges for Keeping Javan Porcupines" and on this occasion we will discuss about 'Employee Fired for Refusing to Attend Office Party Deemed Boring'.

A man was fired from his company for a unique reason. He was unilaterally dismissed because he was considered boring. The employee certainly didn't accept being treated unprofessionally. He then tried to get his former company to pay for their mistakes. Cubik Partners, a management consulting firm, apparently wants all employees to be close friends. The company is said to encourage its employees to build teamwork by spending frequent time together. When one employee refused to participate, the France-based firm terminated the employment relationship.[1]

The man, identified as Mr. T, was fired in 2015. At the time, he frequently refused to participate in seminars and weekend drinking events. Mr. T apparently annoyed his superiors and colleagues by frequently missing these events, finding them boring. Mr. T was dissatisfied with this decision and filed a lawsuit against his former company. He felt entitled to be critical and rejected the company's policy of forcing him to participate in various events outside of work hours. Mr. T also refused to attend office events because they would require him to share a bed with a coworker.[2] And if you have any legal issue in Indonesia territory, contact us for business inquiry, feel free in 24 hour, we will be glad to assist you. 

*) For further information please contact:

Mahmud Kusuma Advocate

Law Office

Jakarta - Indonesia.

E-mail: mahmudkusuma22@gmail.com

________________

References:

1. "Pegawai Dipecat karena Tak Mau Ikut Pesta Kantor, Berakhir Dapat Banyak Uang", wolipop.detik.com, Rahmi Anjani, 25 Nov 2022, Diakses pada tanggal 26 Januari 2026, Link: https://wolipop.detik.com/worklife/d-6426682/pegawai-dipecat-karena-tak-mau-ikut-pesta-kantor-berakhir-dapat-banyak-uang.

2. Ibid.